Convolution
Potentially, the fluence rate for any irradiation profile may be obtained by
launching photons distributed spatially with a probability density function equal
to the irradiation profile. Since many photons must be launched at a fixed point
before the random fluctuation of the Monte Carlo process becomes small,
launching photons from different places increases the total number of photons
which must be launched before statistical errors become negligible. Fortunately,
the fluence rate which results from photons launched at a single point
corresponds to the Green's function G(x,y,z) for the medium. Since the
irradiation source profile is not a function of depth, the convolution is independent
of z.
Figure 2.6:
Illustration of the difference between convolution Equations (2.18) and
(2.19). Figure A shows a circle of constant Green's function and Figure B shows
the circle of constant source. Cylindrical symmetry in both the Green's function
and the source has been assumed.
|
|
The fluence rate for an arbitrary irradiation profile may be obtained by
convolving the Green's function profile with the irradiation source function S(x,y)
 |
(2.17) |
In cylindrical coordinates, the convolution of a cylindrically symmetric irradiation
source S(r) and Green's function G(r) will be cylindrically symmetric. This
convolution may be written (referring to Figure 2.6)
![\begin{displaymath}
\Phi(r) =\int_0^\infty S(r') \left[\int_0^{2\pi}
G(\sqrt{ {r'}^2+r^2-2r r'\cos\theta}\, d\theta\right]\, r'dr'
\end{displaymath}](img116.gif) |
(2.18) |
or alternatively as,
![\begin{displaymath}
\Phi(r) =\int_0^\infty G(r') \left[\int_0^{2\pi}
S(\sqrt{ {r'}^2+r^2-2r r'\cos\theta}\, d\theta\right]\, r'dr'
\end{displaymath}](img117.gif) |
(2.19) |
Both integrals should give the same results, providing a convenient check on any
convolution implementation. The advantage of Equation (2.19) is that the integral
over the source needs to be done just once for a particular radius r and
absorption distributions at all depths for the radius r can be calculated.
A Gaussian source function with a e-2 radius of R is given by
where S0 is related to the total power P of the beam by
 |
(2.21) |
Substituting Equation (2.20) into Equation (2.19) yields
![\begin{displaymath}
\Phi(r) = S_0 e^{-2(r/R)^2} \int_0^\infty G(r') e^{-2(r'/R)^...
...[\int_0^{2\pi} e^{4rr'\cos\theta/R^2} \, d\theta\right]\,r'dr'
\end{displaymath}](img119.gif) |
(2.22) |
The integral in brackets reduces to a zero order modified Bessel function, and the
Equation for the fluence becomes
 |
(2.23) |
Figure 2.7:
Illustration of different relations between the flat beam diameter R,
the radius at which the fluence is desired r and the integration radius r' of a
constant Green's function value. Integration of the source function around the
gray circles yields
in the top case,
in the next, and zero for the last
two cases.
|
|
The source function for a flat beam with radius R is
 |
(2.24) |
where S0 equals the total power divided by the area of the beam. Substituting
Equation (2.24) into Equation (2.19) yields
 |
(2.25) |
where the different cases for Q(r,r') are shown in Figure 2.7. Specifically,
 |
(2.26) |
These convolution equations are used to calculate the finite beam fluence
rates used in Chapter 4 to evaluate the accuracy of the three-dimensional delta-
Eddington fluence rate. Since the Monte Carlo method is used as the standard
against which the delta-Eddington approximation is compared, the Monte Carlo
method was tested extensively. The results of these tests are presented below.
|