omlc

Home

contents

up

next

previous

Light Transport in Tissue


Motivation

The laser as a tool is becoming available to a growing number of physicians, but before the doctor can use this tool he must select a laser, a beam power, a spot size, and an irradiation time. Since small differences in any of these parameters can determine whether an application is efficacious or disastrous, some a priori knowledge about the effects of each parameter is needed. This information is usually provided by mathematical models.

Any model of a laser treatment--photochemical, thermal, or ablative--is based on the distribution of light in the tissue. For example, in thermal and ablative applications, the light distribution is directly proportional to the heat source used in the thermal model. In photochemical applications involving hematoporphyrin derivative, the release of singlet oxygen is proportional to the light distribution. Since photodynamic, thermal, and ablative models are only as good as the optical model they are based on, it unfortunate that current biomedical light transport models are approximate (e.g., the diffusion approximation) or heuristic (Kubelka-Munk). The paint, paper, photographic, and plastic industries; meteorology; oceanography; astrophysics; analytic chemistry; and biology have all used exact optical models; however, these methods have heretofore not been utilized in biomedical applications.

Accurate models are needed because approximate models fail near tissue boundaries. In many applications, the distribution of light immediately beneath the point of irradiation is critical. In these regions the assumptions made in the approximate models are worst. For example, in the Kubelka-Munk approximation the distribution of light immediately subsurface is assumed isotropic. Since light must undergo several scattering events before an isotropic profile is reached this approximation is poorest near the surface.

The optical properties of some tissues have been measured, but often in the context of the heuristic Kubelka-Munk model and consequently, these parameters should only be used with the Kubelka-Munk theory. Existing methods are impractical for measurement of optical properties as a function of wavelength. Current methods are ill-suited because they require diffuse light [64], many sample thicknesses [70], or goniophotometric measurements [13]. A practical method for measurement of optical properties as a function of wavelength is needed. The single scattering phase function (defined below) characterizing a tissue must also be measured. Recent attempts to measure the phase function [5,13] have not generated quantitative expressions that may be used in more complete models.

S. A. Prahl."Light Transport in Tissue," PhD thesis, University of Texas at Austin, 1988.